Daily DispatchDaily Dispatch

BCM remains under financial cosh despite modest turnaround

Audit committee flags growing debtors’ book, electricity losses, billing and governance issues

Buffalo City Metro mayor Princess Faku welcomed the audit committee’s latest report, saying while the positives were encouraging, significant challenges remained.
ICC Buffalo City Metro mayor Princess Faku welcomed the audit committee’s latest report, saying while the positives were encouraging, significant challenges remained.Picture: Supplied

The Buffalo City Metro remains under severe financial pressure, with a debtors’ book of almost R10bn and widening electricity losses, despite signs of improvement in its overall financial performance.

The caution has been issued by an independent audit committee, an advisory body that provides impartial oversight of internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and compliance for the city.

The metro’s financial strain is being driven by declining revenue collection, an increase in unpaid accounts by households, businesses and government departments, and persistent operational challenges — even as officials point to a modest turnaround in some key indicators.

Presenting the audit committee’s latest report to a special council meeting on Thursday, interim chair Wisdom Mushohwe said the metro’s finances were not “all doom and gloom” but cautioned that deep-rooted risks continued to threaten its long-term sustainability.

“The city’s biggest financial challenge remains the growing debtors’ book, which increased from R8.6bn to R9.7bn,” Mushohwe said.

Collection rates remain below the metro’s 78% target, averaging about 71% and placing sustained pressure on cash flow and liquidity.

The report paints a mixed picture of a municipality attempting to stabilise its finances while grappling with structural weaknesses in revenue collection, governance and service delivery.

On paper, there are signs of improvement.

Income increased from R5.3bn to R5.9bn compared with the same period in the previous financial year, though expenditure rose to R5.9bn.

The operating loss narrowed sharply from R300m to R47m, and after accounting for transfers and subsidies, the metro recorded a surplus of R317m — a marked improvement from the R127m deficit reported a year earlier.

But Mushohwe warned that these gains could be undermined if fundamental issues were not addressed.

Only 23% of performance targets were achieved during the period under review, raising concerns about year-end outcomes

Irregular expenditure remains above R10bn, requiring urgent intervention and stronger consequence management, while weak performance management systems and a lack of corrective action plans across several directorates continue to pose a risk to achieving a clean audit outcome.

“Persistent failure to meet performance targets, inadequate supporting evidence and the absence of corrective action plans represent a risk to the city’s ability to achieve an unmodified audit outcome,” he said.

Only 23% of performance targets were achieved during the period under review, raising concerns about year-end outcomes.

The metro’s risk profile remains largely unchanged, with slow implementation of mitigation measures and ineffective risk management practices compounding the situation.

Service delivery pressures are also feeding into the city’s financial difficulties.

Continuing vandalism of infrastructure, combined with limited resources to address the scourge, is affecting water and electricity services, as well as ICT network availability.

At the same time, a growing number of unresolved billing disputes — particularly related to water accounts — is discouraging residents from paying, further weakening revenue collection.

The Buffalo City Metro has been forced to write off R27m in rates owed by one of the city’s top property management companies after it successfully challenged its municipal bill of almost R33m in court. The write-off was approved at a recent council meeting. The metro had placed Own Haven Housing Association — a social housing company which owns a number of rental accommodation establishments for low-income earners in KuGompo City — in the wrong rating category. After a court ruling, the city has been forced to write off R27m of the R32.9m debt originally owed to it by Own Haven. A lengthy standoff ensued when the municipality classified Own Haven’s properties as residential, instead of rating it as a public benefit organisation (PBO). The company had at some point withheld its rate payments, arguing that as a PBO it should not be charged under the residential rating category. This, it said, was based on the fact that social housing institutions were registered as PBOs in terms of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. The R32.9m municipal debt, for a number of its properties in KuGompo City, had been accumulated between 2019 and 2025. In late 2025, the high court in Makhanda ordered that the company should pay just R5.9m of its initial debt as a final settlement to BCM. The accumulated rates related to Own Haven properties such as Skyview, Southernwood Square, Reservoir Mews and two other properties in the metro. As Own Haven considered that they were at all times entitled to be treated as a Public Benefit Organisation, our view is that it should never have been necessary that the matter proceed to court and that the municipality should have engaged openly on this matter Attempts to get comment from Own Haven or its attorneys, were unsuccessful on Thursday. However, a report tabled before council last week by the metro’s acting chief financial officer, Vincent Pillay, revealed that Own Haven had been embroiled in a protracted battle with the metro for its rating status to be changed from residential to the PBO category. “Own Haven properties were categorised as residential properties in both the 2017 and 2022 valuation rolls,” Pillay wrote. “In accordance with the BCM property rates policy, the rates levied during the validity period of these valuation rolls were based on the residential tariffs applicable at the time. “In 2018 and again in 2023, Own Haven submitted applications requesting a change in the rating category of its properties, from residential to PBO, on the basis that social housing institutions are registered as such in terms of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. “Their applications were, however, unsuccessful,” Pillay wrote. This was because, in terms of the Municipal Property Rates Act 6 of 2004, social housing institutions were not recognised as PBOs for municipal rating purposes. After its application was rejected by the city, Pillay said, Own Haven disputed its property rates bill, withheld payment and pursued the matter through the courts. In September 2025, the company was ordered by the high court to pay only R5.9m of its outstanding R32.9m municipal bill for the financial years 2019 to 2025. The court also ordered that BCM had no further claim against Own Haven in respect of property rates for the 2018/2019 to 2024/2025 financial years. The city was ordered to pay 20% of the legal costs in the matter. Pillay said during the 2025/2026 financial year, BCM amended its property rates policy “to introduce a new rating category for social housing institutions, with a tariff equal to that applied to PBOs”. Pillay then recommended to the council that in light of the court order, the remaining amount of R27m should be classified as irrecoverable debt and written off. Council agreed with the recommendation. Pillay had warned that failure to adhere and implement the court order “would expose BCM to legal risk, including contempt of court proceedings and reputational harm”. He told council that the write-off represented “a significant reduction in the municipality’s collectible revenue for the period under review”. The city had intended to appeal against the court ruling but later withdrew its application. DA councillor Geoff Walton said on Thursday that the metro’s authorities could have handled the dispute differently. “As Own Haven considered that they were at all times entitled to be treated as a Public Benefit Organisation, our view is that it should never have been necessary that the matter proceed to court and that the municipality should have engaged openly on this matter. “Had they done so, a similar agreement to that imposed by the court could have been reached outside of the court process,” Walton said. Click here to join the Daily Dispatch’s WhatsApp channel and get the latest news delivered straight to your phone Daily Dispatch

The audit committee raised concerns about the metro’s call centre capacity, noting that new queries were being logged faster than they were resolved, contributing to rising debt levels.

“The increase in water billing queries has a negative impact and creates a serious challenge for the city, with consumers ending up withholding payments,” Mushohwe said.

The electricity department remains a major source of financial strain.

The deficit in the division has grown significantly year on year, driven by electricity theft, rising technical losses and operational constraints.

Eskom’s revised billing model — which now charges across multiple points of entry — is adding an estimated R15m a month to the metro’s costs, placing additional pressure on already stretched finances.

While capital expenditure stood at 38% halfway through the financial year and grant spending showed some improvement, the audit committee flagged concerns around procurement deviations, overtime spending, asset management and the growth of irregular expenditure.

The effectiveness of internal controls and the internal audit unit also came under scrutiny, with capacity constraints leading to heavy reliance on external consultants.

A lack of consequence management was identified as another critical weakness undermining governance and accountability.

Despite these concerns, political leaders in the council broadly welcomed the report’s acknowledgement of incremental progress.

Municipalities across SA are already under financial strain, struggling to maintain infrastructure, deliver basic services and balance budgets. Therefore, every rand around each municipality’s coffers counts. It is in this context that the decision by the Buffalo City Metro to write off R27m after losing a property rates court battle is more than just a financial setback — it is a clear indictment of administrative failure and weak governance. Let’s be clear, this was not unavoidable. At the centre of the issue is a basic but costly mistake — in 2017 and again in 2022 evaluations, the municipality incorrectly classified a social housing provider, Own Haven Housing Association (OHHA), under the wrong property rating category. This error triggered a legal dispute that ultimately ended in court, where the municipality lost — and taxpayers lost with it. Originally, the metro had billed OHHA nearly R33m for the period between 2019 and 2025. But after the ruling, only about R5.9m was deemed payable, forcing the city to write off the remaining R27m. This raises uncomfortable but necessary questions. How does a municipality misapply its own rates policy to such an extent? Property categorisation is not a grey area — it is a core administrative function that directly affects revenue collection and financial sustainability. Complexity is not an excuse for poor implementation Supporters of the metro might argue that the legal framework around social housing classification is complex. Indeed, the dispute partly stemmed from how the law treats social housing institutions versus public benefit organisations (PBOs). But complexity is not an excuse for poor implementation. Municipalities are expected to have the expertise — or to seek it — before making decisions with multimillion-rand implications. Surprisingly, it has taken BCM close to eight years to amend its policies “to introduce a new rating category for social housing institutions, with a tariff equal to that applied to PBOs”. To make matters worse, the court ordered BCM to pay 20% of the legal costs in the matter. The money lost through these avoidable legal errors could have gone toward service delivery. There is also a credibility issue. Ratepayers who diligently pay their municipal bills may justifiably feel frustrated when millions are written off due to administrative mistakes. We have reported on similar write-offs before which caused rumblings among ratepayers — R100m for city businesses in 2022 and R1.6bn in irregular expenditure in November 2025. Ultimately, any write off is not just about millions and billions lost. It is about accountability. If municipalities are to regain public confidence, there must be consequences for costly errors, improved internal controls and a commitment to getting the basics right. Because when governance fails at this level, it is not the institution that pays — it is the public. Click here to join the Daily Dispatch’s WhatsApp channel and get the latest news delivered straight to your phone Daily Dispatch

Finance portfolio committee head Yomelela Tyali said there was “willingness for improvement in the city, but more still needs to be done”.

ANC councillor Sakhumzi Caga said the improved financial position offered some relief and could help restore investor confidence but warned that weak revenue collection and slow resolution of billing queries remained serious concerns.

He called for the establishment of a dedicated “query war room” to fast-track the resolution of customer complaints.

Mayor Princess Faku also welcomed the report, saying while the positives were encouraging, significant challenges remained.

She urged the council to urgently fill vacancies in the audit committee to strengthen oversight and support efforts to improve audit outcomes.

DA councillor Geoff Walton said the party appreciated the constructive nature of the audit committee’s findings but cautioned that the underlying issues remained unresolved.

“The report highlights that internal audit findings are receiving more attention. That is welcomed,” Walton said.

“However, we note with concern that the audit action plan is not delivering what is expected and needed. Worrisome may be an understatement.”

He warned that the municipality continued to respond to audit findings rather than address their root causes, saying there was insufficient co-ordination among departments.

“It is now likely that the same, or substantially similar issues, will again be raised by the auditor-general, which could and should have been avoided had matters been dealt with earlier and in a strategic manner,” he said.

Walton also expressed concern that the metro’s improving financial position might not be sustained, particularly with significant cash outflows expected in the final months of the financial year.

“We are not convinced that the financial position at year-end will be much changed from the previous year, but would welcome being proved wrong,” he said.

He also flagged concerns around billing, particularly in respect of water accounts, and the lack of transparency regarding litigation involving the municipality.

The audit committee’s report makes it clear that without decisive action to improve revenue collection, strengthen governance and address service delivery failures, any gains made so far may prove difficult to sustain.

Click here to join the Daily Dispatch’s WhatsApp channel and get the latest news delivered straight to your phone

Daily Dispatch